“YOU KNOW NOTHING!”: INCOMPETENCE ACCUSATIONS AS FACEWORK IN FACEBOOK-COMMENTS
Keywords:
face, facework, impoliteness, internet-communication, speech strategy
Abstract
The given article sheds light on linguistic means and peculiarities of impoliteness as a subtype of facework in the discourse of comments to posts in the groups of Ukrainian-language segments in the Facebook social network with resort to the tactic of accusing the interlocutor of being incompetent.
References
1. Austin P. (1990). Politeness revisited – the dark side. – Bell A., and Holmes J. (eds). New Zealand ways of speaking English. Philadelphia: 277-293.
2. Bousfield D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam.
3. Brown P. and Levinson S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. London, New York.
4. Culpeper J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge.
5. Culpeper J. and Hardaker C. (2017). Impoliteness. – Culpeper J., Haugh M., and Kadar D.Z. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: 199-225.
6. Goffman E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. New York.
7. Grimshaw A.D. (1990). Research on conflict talk: antecedents, resources, findings, directions. – Grimshaw A.D. (ed). Sociolinguistic Investigations
of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: 281–324.
8. Kadar D.Z. and Culpeper J. (2010). Historical (Im) politeness: An Introduction. – Kadar D.Z., and Culpeper J. (eds). Historical (Im)politeness. Bern: 9–36.
9. Kadt E.(de) (1998). The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language. – Journal of Pragmatics 29: 173–191.
10. Spencer-Oatey H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. – Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 635–786.
11. Terkourafi M. (2008). Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness and rudeness. – Bousfield D., and Locher M.A. (eds). Impoliteness in language:
studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: 45–74.
12. Watts R.J. (1992). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: reconsidering claims for Universality. – Watts R.J., Ide S., and Ehlich K. (eds). Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: 43–69.
2. Bousfield D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam.
3. Brown P. and Levinson S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. London, New York.
4. Culpeper J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge.
5. Culpeper J. and Hardaker C. (2017). Impoliteness. – Culpeper J., Haugh M., and Kadar D.Z. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: 199-225.
6. Goffman E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. New York.
7. Grimshaw A.D. (1990). Research on conflict talk: antecedents, resources, findings, directions. – Grimshaw A.D. (ed). Sociolinguistic Investigations
of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: 281–324.
8. Kadar D.Z. and Culpeper J. (2010). Historical (Im) politeness: An Introduction. – Kadar D.Z., and Culpeper J. (eds). Historical (Im)politeness. Bern: 9–36.
9. Kadt E.(de) (1998). The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language. – Journal of Pragmatics 29: 173–191.
10. Spencer-Oatey H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. – Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 635–786.
11. Terkourafi M. (2008). Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness and rudeness. – Bousfield D., and Locher M.A. (eds). Impoliteness in language:
studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: 45–74.
12. Watts R.J. (1992). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: reconsidering claims for Universality. – Watts R.J., Ide S., and Ehlich K. (eds). Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: 43–69.
Published
2018-02-26
Pages
226-230
Issue
Section
СЕКЦІЯ 4. СЛОВ’ЯНСЬКІ МОВИ
