LEXICAL COMBINATIONS IN BRITISH FICTION TEXTS ON MILITARY THEMES

Ivan Antonovych Bekhta; Iryna Ihorivna Shainer

doi:10.32999/ksu2663-3426/2019-2-1

Ivan Antonovych Bekhta
Iryna Ihorivna Shainer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2663-3426/2019-2-1

Keywords: lexical-semantic space, lexical combinations, postmodernism, pragmatic stylistics, extra-lingual context

Abstract

This article focuses on lexical-semantic and pragmatic-stylistic properties of lexical combinations in British fiction texts on military themes of the beginning of the XXI century. The novelty of the research is accounted for by shedding light on the semantic and pragmatic-stylistic characteristics of lexical units and their combinations representing the war theme in British fiction texts on military themes of the 2000–2017 on the basis of pragmatic-stylistic and pragmatic-discourse approaches, in particular, analysing lexical-semantic space within its three-dimensional expansion: semantic, thematic and associative; detecting tendencies of functioning of lexical combinations and strategies chosen by the author in order to render an urgent problem of war in contemporary literary fiction texts.

Lexical-semantic space is considered to be a complex system of lexical units, united into microsystems (fields, groups, subgroups, etc.) on the basis of a common theme and conceptual meaning representing a certain conceptual sphere. Interpretation of the literary texts and their general influence on readers are highly dependent on the lexical units, thoroughly selected by the author in accordance with his/her intention. The outlining of lexical-semantic, lexical-thematic and lexical-associative groups and fields contributed to the detailed analysis of functional representation of the lexical structures of literary texts at the deep and surface levels, modelling of the core and peripheral information blocks of the lexical-semantic space of a text.

This research concentrates on the text-composing lexical units and combinations of the contemporary British literary prose text on military themes taking into account lingual and extra-lingual factors determining their use by the author. Interpretation of the literary text and its general influence on the reader highly depends on the lexical units selected by the author. Thus, it seems reasonable to conduct a detailed study of lexical-stylistic peculiarities and pragmatic direction of the literary prose text taking into consideration all the extra-lingual conditions on the basis of pragmatic stylistics. Integrating the methods of stylistics and pragmatics, pragmatic stylistics is underpinned with the usage-based approach to the study of the peculiarities of lexical units and their combinations, as well as the analysis of their pragmatic direction to the recipient taking into account the extra-lingual context. All the lexical structures in a literary text are chosen by the author with a definite aim – creating a certain atmosphere and producing a desired effect on the reader. The author’s intentions are highly influenced by the social, extra-lingual context. This is quite obvious in the texts on military themes, since its micro-inclusions frequently penetrate the texts of other genres and themes. The pragmatic-stylistic approach contributes to a deeper immersion into the literary discourse, taking into consideration the whole context and extra-linguistic factors. It opens the new horizons to the further investigation of the contemporary British literary texts on military themes.

References

1. Бабенко Л.Г. Лингвистический анализ художественного текста. Теория и практика : учебник, практикум. 3-е изд., испр. Москва : Флинта : Наука, 2005. 496 с.
2. Безугла Л.Р. До питання розмежування прагматики, стилістики та прагмастилістики. Вiсник Харкiвського нацiонального унiверситету iмені В.Н. Каразiна. Серія «Романо-германська філологія. Методика викладання іноземних мов». 2014. Вип. 77. № 1102. С. 6–11.
3. Бехта І.А. Дискурс наратора в англомовній прозі : монографія. Київ : Грамота, 2004. 304 с.
4. Ємець О.В. Засоби прагматичної стилістики і проблеми перекладу. Наукові записки НДУ імені М. Гоголя. 2014. Кн. 3. С. 67–70.
5. Качак Т. Тема війни і миру в сучасній українській прозі для дітей та юнацтва. Українська література в загальноосвітній школі. 2015. № 3. С. 22–24.
6. Кухаренко В.А. Інтерпретація тексту. Вінниця : Нова Книга, 2004. 272 с.
7. Лайонз Дж. Лингвистическая семантика. Москва, 2003. 397 с.
8. Лотман Ю.М. Об искусстве: структура художественного текста. Санкт-Петербург : Искусство-СПБ, 2000. 704 с.
9. Межжеріна Г.В. Структурна організація семантичних одиниць (поле – лексико-семантична група – слово). Актуальні проблеми української лінгвістики: теорія і практика. Київ, 2002. Вип. 5. С. 114−126.
10. Пихтовникова Л.С. Прагмастилистика дискурса в свете лингвосинергетической парадигмы. Когниция, коммуникация, дискурс. Харків, 2016. № 13. С. 114–130.
11. Barlow A. The Great War in British Literature: Cambridge Contexts in Literature. Cambridge, 2000. 130 p.
12. Bergonzi B. Wartime and Aftermath: English Literature and the Background 1939–60. Oxford, 1993. 230 p.
13. Black E. Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh, 2006. 166 p.
14. Caink A. The Art of Repetition in Muriel Spark’s Telling. Pragmatic Literary Stylistics / ed. By S. Chapman, B. Clark. London, 2014. P. 16–35.
15. Cobley E. Postmodernist War Fiction : Findley’s The Wars. Canadian Literature. 1995. № 147. Р. 98–124.
16. Hart J. The Poetics of Otherness: War, Trauma and Literature. New York, 2015. 263 p.
17. Hewison R. Under Siege: Literary Life in London, 1939–45. Oxford, 1977. 219 p.
18. Hickey L. Stylistics, Pragmatics and Pragmastylistics. Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire. Langues et littératures modernes. 1993. T. 71. P. 573–586.
19. Ho Y. Corpus Stylistics in Principles and Practice. London, 2011. 254 p.
20. Hoey M. Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London, New York : Routledge, 2001. 206 p.
21. Jeffries L. Opposition in Discourse: The Construction of Oppositional Meaning. London, 2014. 150 p.
22. Kaiter E. The War Novel, a Modernist and Postmodernist Representation Based on History and Fiction. Multicultural Representations. Literature and Discourse as Forms of Dialogue. 2016. P. 204–208.
23. Kirszner L.G., Mandell S.R. Fiction: Reading, Reacting, Writing. Orlando, 1993. 608 p.
24. Lindas J. Engaging with Postmodernism: An Examination of Literature and the Canon. Undergraduate Honors Theses, 2013. 423 p.
25. Piette A. Imagination at War: British Fiction and Poetry, 1939–1945. Paperback, 1995. 352 p.
26. Sarma G. The War Novel: Hemingway and After: thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosopy. Shillong, 2001. 223 p.
27. Simon-Vandenbergen A.-M., Aijmer K. The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin, 2008. 405 p.
28. Smith A.K. The Second Battlefield: Women, Modernism and the First World War. Manchester, 2000. 214 p.
29. Taylor D.J. After the War: The Novel and English Society Since 1945. London, 1993. 128 p.
30. Warner Ch. Literary Pragmatics and Stylistics. The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics / ed. By M. Burke. London ; New York : Routledge, 2014. P. 362–377.