CONVERSION AND COMPOUND MODELS OF RELIGIOUS VOCABULARY FORMATION IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
Abstract
The article outlines the concept of “conversion”, which is defined as an affixless, derivational way of word formation, inwhich a new word formed from another part of the language does not acquire an external word-forming rearrangement. Theconcept of “word formation” has also been analyzed and the phonetic component of compounds of religious vocabularycharacterized. The structural classification has been distinguished taking into account the structure of compoundings. It hasbeen found that among the layer of religious vocabulary derivational connections of conversion occur between two, three ormore words, and the main ways of direction of this process have been identified. Five main models of conversion of lexicalunits of the religious sphere have been determined, such as: Noun – Verb, which further is divided into three categories,Verb – Noun, Adjective – Noun, Noun – Adjective, Adjective – Verb. The process of substantivization of religious vocabularyas a variant of conversion has also been analyzed. Under substantivization we understand the process of changingthe paradigm of the basic word and a part of speech. Analysis of religious vocabulary shows that the transition is fromadjectives to nouns, the first acquires the characteristic features of the latter.The article presents an analysis of religiousvocabulary based on the dictionary of O. O. Azarov “Comprehensive English-Russian dictionary of religious terminology”, which allows to identify such productive models of word formation of religious vocabulary in English: Noun + Noun, Noun+ Participle, Adjective + Noun, Noun + Preposition + Noun, Participle + Noun, Pronoun + Noun, Adjective + Participle.These models are most actively involved in the creation of religious vocabulary in English, as they have the largest numberof words in their structure. Compounds of religious lexis are divided into root compounds and compound derivatives,the structural integrity of which allows to distinguish them from phrases. Considering the components of compound words,the main element can be both the first and second part. According to the relationship between the components, compoundsare divided into endocentric and exocentric types. The first is expressed by a compound word, the meaning of which isderived from the sum of the meanings of the compound’s components, the latter includes complex words, the meaningof which is not determined by any of its constituent elements. Among the layer of religious vocabulary of the Englishlanguage we distinguish the following endocentric models: Adj + N = N, V + N = N, Part I + N = N, Ger + N = N, N + N = Nand exocentric models: Participle + N = Adj, N+Pro.=Adj, V+Prep.=N, Adv+Participle=Adj.
References
2. Антрушина Г.Б., Афанасьева О.В., Морозова Н.Н. Лексикология английского языка. English Lexicology : учебник и практикум. 8-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва : Издательство Юрайт, 2018. 287 с.
3. Арнольд И.В. Лексикология современного английского языка. Москва : Флинта, 2012. 376 с.
4. Блумфилд Л. Язык : монография. Москва : Прогресс, 1968. 606 с.
5. Єнікєєва С. М. Скорочення слова як механізм формотворення та словотворення в сучасній англійській мові. Вісник Житомирського державного університету імені Івана Франка. 2006. № 27. С. 93–96.
6. Зацний Ю.А. Про деякі тенденції в словотвірних процесах сучасної англійської мови. Нова філологія. 2014. № 64. С. 162–170.
7. Ментинська І.Б., Наконечна Г.В. Структурно-словотвірні особливості сучасної української комп’ютерної термінології. Вісник Нац. ун-ту «Львівська політехніка». «Проблеми української термінології». 2016. № 842. С. 86–91.
8. Bauer L. Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2003 366 p.
9. Carstairs-McCarthy Andrew. An Introduction to English Morphology: Words and Their Structure. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2002. 160 p.
10. Collins Online English Dictionary. URL: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/ (дата звернення: 17.03.2021).
11. Lee D.W. Functional Change in Early English : Columbia University dissertation. Menasha, Wisc., 1948. 140 p.
12. O'Grady W. Language acquisition without Universal Grammar: a general nativist proposal for L2 learning. Second Language Research. Psychology. 1996. № 4 (12). P. 374–397.
13. Ortner L., Müller-Bollhagen E. Deutsche Wortbildung: Typen und Tendenzen in der Gegenwartssprache. Substantivkomposita. Berlin ; New York : de Gruyter, 1991. Hauptteil 4. 863 S.