DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACTS IN OLD ENGLISH LANGUAGE

Keywords: imperative, diachrony, historical pragmatics, request, order

Abstract

The article is aimed to investigate speech acts in the Old English language (7–11 centuries). Our study focuses on oneof the types of speech acts – directives. Literary monuments of the Old English language, the oldest of which date back tothe 7th century, served as illustrative material.We have studied and identified the main types of directives that were most manifested in the language of the abovemantioned period. Based on previous researches, and analyzing the sources of illustrative material, we were able to traceback the peculiarities of the directives usage in the Old English language, and to make a comparative analysis.The diachronic analysis revealed that orders were the most commonly used type of directive speech acts. They provedto be the most diachronically stable and have retained a one-part structure since the Old English period. That is whyour research focuses on this period, as it is important to investigate the origin and formation of directives, which in itsfurther development became an important part of the imperatives. The grammaticalization of directives and imperativesentences in general was mainly pragmatic and morphological. It was connected to the development of the imperativemood and language in general.The usage of electronic corpora has helped us to determine the frequency of manifestation of a particular directivemarker in literary monuments. The article analyzes four main types of directives: ic bidde, sceu scealt / ge sculon, uton,neodþearf / þearf. Performative directives were among the most widely used and widespread in the written literature of the period under study. In Old English, the typical model of a directive speech act was: a directive verb in the first personsingular or plural + object. A subordinate clause with a request was often added with the specified action that the speakerrequired to perform.Our study allowed us to establish that the choice of directives depended (in most cases) on face threat. Instead,the peculiarities of their manifestation had a different purpose. Thus, performatives were used to emphasize the effectof the speech act and to ensure the performance of a certain action. Other types of directives were used to emphasizethe urgency and necessity of the implementation of a particular act, and to clarify to whom it applies. We found thatthe above mentioned directives were used mainly in religious texts.

References

1. Dawn A. Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760). Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 135. Amsterdam / Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 2005. 374 p.
2. Brown P., Levinson S.C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, 1987. 358 p.
3. Busse U. Changing politeness strategies in English request: A diachronic investigation. Studies in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A Festschrift for Akio Oizumi / Jacek Fisiak (ed). Frankfurt/Main : Peter Lang., 2002. P. 17–35.
4. Culpeper J., Dawn A. Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts. Speech Acts in the History Of English / Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsanien (eds.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 2008. P. 45–84.
5. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Elena Samino. Constructing witches and spells: Speech acts and activity types in Early Modern England. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. Vol. 1.1, 2000. P. 97–116.
6. Dictionary of Old English Corpus (DOEC). University of Toronto. https://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/ (дата звернення: 15.03.2021).
7. Kohnen Th. “Let me bee so bold to request you to tell me”: Constructions with “let me” in the history of English directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. Vol. 5:1. 2004. P. 159–173.
8. Kohnen Th.. Linguistic Politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A study of Old English address terms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. Vol. 9.1. 2008. P. 140–158.
9. Kohnen Th. Text types and methodology of diachronic speech ans analysis. Methods in Historical Pragmatics / Taavitsainen Irma, Fitzmaurice Susan (eds.). Berlin – New-York : Mouton de Gruyter, 2007. P. 139–166.
10. Leech G.N. Principles of Pragmatics. London : Longman, 1983. 246 p.
11. Milfull Inge B. Advice. Performative expression in Middle Scots. Anglistentag 2003. Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2004. P. 57–70.
12. Searl John R. Classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5. 1976. P. 1–24.
13. Searl John R. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, 1969. 214 p.
14. Taavitsainen Irma, Jucker Andreas H. Speech act verbs and speech acts in the history of English. Methods in Historical Pragmatics / Taavitsainen Irma, Fitzmaurice Susan (eds.). Berlin – New-York : Mouton deGruyter, 2007. P. 107–138.
15. The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. https://helsinkicorpus.arts.gla.ac.uk/display.py?fs=100&what=corpus (дата звернення: 01.03.2021).
Published
2021-08-02
Pages
66-71