APPROACHES TO STUDYING ENGLISH RESTORATION DRAMA
Abstract
This study applied cognitive-pragmatic, literary criticism and theory of theatre approaches to summarize findings on the dramatic discourse of English Restoration. In this article, I set out the main points of Stuart Restoration ideology, summarize findings on the predominant concepts of that time, substantiate that the institution of theatre became a leading ideological instrument during the English Restoration, and single out its two main functions: entertainment and dissemination of absolutist ideology. In this paper, the subject matter and dramatis personae of Restoration drama have been characterized. The paper focuses on generalizing the research results of comparative studies of Restoration and Elizabethan drama which concern their scope, genres, and morality. The conclusions reached in the studies that reported on borrowings in repertoire from native, French and Spanish sources at the beginning of Restoration and the influence of English and continental writers have been synthesized. Further investigation of English Restoration drama revealed an unprecedented genre variety and combination which demonstrated signs of development in different directions during the 1660s. In this article, I state that the existing studies have reported on active behaviour of Restoration audiences during the performances, describe usual patterns of their behavior, and make conclusions as to the direct influence of such behavior on the processes of drama production and perception. The existing research has demonstrated weak points in some key areas, such as Restoration audiences’ composition. Despite the fact that scholars point to various sources of information as to the theatre-goers’ personalities in the seventeenth century, there is still no consensus of opinions on this issue. Although Restoration drama research demonstrably improved over the 20th and 21st centuries, further research on Elizabethan and Restoration drama cognitive construals of the world, comparative analysis of original plays and adaptations, literary genres origin and development, interactional patterns of viewers and characters of Restoration drama is recommended.
References
2. Canfield D.J. Heroes and States. On the ideology of Restoration Tragedy. Lexington, KY : University Press of Kentucky, 2000. 249 p.
3. Canfield D.J. Tricksters and estates: On the ideology of Restoration comedy. Lexington, KY : University Press of Kentucky, 1997. 328 p.
4. Cavaillè J.P. Libertine and libertinism: Polemic uses of the terms in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century English and Scottish literature. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies. Vol. 12. № 2. 2012. P. 12–36. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23242162. DOI: 10.1353/ jem.2012.0010 (дата звернення: 05.08.2019).
5. Corman B. Comedy. The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre / D.P. Fisk (Ed.). Cambridge, 2000. P. 52–69.
6. Corman B. Restoration Studies and the New Historicism: The Case of Aphra Behn. The Restoration Mind / W.G. Marshall (Ed.). University of Delaware Press, 1997. P. 252–271.
7. Dharwadker A. Class, Authorship, and the Social Intertexture of Genre in Restoration Theater. Studies in English Literature, Restoration and Eighteenth Century 1500–1900. 1997. Vol. 37. № 3. P. 461–482.
8. Dobrée B. Restoration Comedy 1660–1720. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1924. 188 p.
9. Dobson M. Adaptations and Revivals. The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre / D.P. Fisk (Ed.) Cambridge, 2000. P. 40–51.
10. Esslin M. The field of drama: How the signs of drama create meaning on stage and screen. New York : Methuen, 1987. 192 p.
11. Four Restoration libertine plays / D.P. Fisk (Ed.). 4th ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005. 414 p.
12. Gill P. Gender, sexuality, and marriage. The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre / D.P. Fisk (Ed.). Cambridge, 2000. P. 191–208.
13. González-Treviño A.E. “Kings and their crowns”: Signs of monarchy and the spectacle of new world otherness in heroic drama and public pageantry. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture. 2013. Vol. 42. P. 103–121. DOI: 10.1353/sec.2013.0003 (дата звернення: 05.08.2020).
14. Grant R.G., Kay A., Kerrigan M. History of Britain & Ireland: The definitive visual guide. London : DK Publishing, 2011. 400 p.
15. Aphra Behn’s “Emperor of the moon” and its French source “Arlequin, Empereur dans la lune” / J.A. Hayden, D.J. Worden (Eds.). Cambridge, United Kingdom : Modern Humanities Research Association, 2019. 176 p. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvhrcz77 (дата звернення: 05.08.2020).
16. Hume R.D. Diversity and Development in Restoration Comedy 1660-1679. Eighteenth-Century Studies. 1972. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 365–397.
17. Krutch J.W. Comedy and conscience after the Restoration. New York : Columbia University Press, 1924. 300 p.
18. Langhans E.A. The theatre. The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre / D.P. Fisk (Ed.). Cambridge, 2000. P. 1–18.
19. Love H. Who Were the Restoration Audience? The Yearbook of English Studies. 1980. Vol. 10. Literature and Its Audience. I Special Number. P. 21–44.
20. Mullan J., Beadle R., Davies H.A. Shrimpton N. 2020. English Literature. Encyclopædia Britannica. URL: https://britannica.com/art/English-literature (дата звернення: 07.08.2020).
21. Neagle R.C. The Restoration theater world and the plays of William Wycherley : Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Loyola University of Chicago, 1989. 273 p.
22. Nettleton G.H. English drama of the Restoration and eighteenth century (1642–1780). New York : The Macmillan Company. (Classic Reprint) Forgotten Books, 2017. 386 p.
23. Roach J. The performance. The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre / D.P. Fisk (Ed.). Cambridge, 2000. P. 19–39.
24. Rose J. Godly Kingship in Restoration England: The Politics of The Royal Supremacy, 1660–1688. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011. 332 p.
25. Schmid H.-J. Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable. Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. Vol. 4: Cognitive pragmatics. Handbooks of pragmatics / H.-J. Schmid (ed.). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, 2012. 664 p.
26. Schneider B.N. The ethos of Restoration comedy. Champaign, IL : University of Illinois Press, 1971, 201 p.
27. Scouten A.H. Restoration and 18th century drama. New York : St Martin’s Press, 1980. 160 p.
28. Shevchenko, I. Introduction. Еnactive meaningmaking in the discourse of theatre and film. Cognition, Communication, Discourse. 2019. Vol. 19. P. 15–19. DOI: 10.26565/2218-2926-2019-19-01 (дата звернення: 05.08.2020).
29. Styan J.L. Restoration Comedy in Performance. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1986. 287 p.
30. Summers M. The Restoration theatre. London : K. Paul, Tench, Trubner & Co, 1934. 420 p.
31. Tindemans K. Nature, desire, and the law: On libertinism and early modern legal theory. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies. 2012. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 133–145. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23242168. DOI:10.1353/jem.2012.0009 (дата звернення: 05.08.2020).
32. Vanhaesebrouck K., Dehert P. Introduction: Libertine bodies or the politics of Baroque corporeality. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies. 2012. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 1–11. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23242161. DOI:10.1353/jem.2012.0008 (дата звернення: 08.08.2020).
33. Walkling A.R. Court Culture and ‘Absolutism’ in Restoration England. The Court Historian. 2001. Vol. 6. № 3. P. 225–233. DOI: 10.1179/cou.2001.6.3.003 (дата звернення: 05.08.2020).
34. Webster J.W. Performing libertinism in Charles II’s court: Politics, drama, sexuality. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 260 p.
35. Zimbardo R.A. At zero point: Discourse, culture, and satire in Restoration England. Lexington, KY : University Press of Kentucky, 1998. 208 p.
