WAR NARRATIVE: DEFINITION AND STRUCTURE (IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN ARMED CONFLICTS)

Keywords: narrative, war narrative, strategic narrative, discourse, strategic communications, communicative effect, cognitive dimension

Abstract

Modern armed conflicts are characterized by their “hybrid” nature, which is manifested in the use of both conventional and non-conventional methods of warfare, which often include means of influencing the enemy. The implementation of this influence in the social networks, and media is aimed at affecting the cognitive or socio-cognitive dimension of target audiences, which in turn leads to a change in perception, attitude, and outlook on the conflict. One of the instruments of such influence is the “narrative”, a concept that in the context of hybrid warfare acquires a new meaning, going beyond the purely narrative discourse.The purpose of the study is to conceptualize the term “war narrative” and develop its preliminary level model. To achieve this goal, various approaches to the interpretation of narrative in the humanities, in particular in narratology and philosophy, are considered. Special attention is given to the role of narratives in the field of strategic communications and the concept of “strategic narrative”, which is most widely used in the context of military communication.The analysis has revealed that the concept of “war narrative” should integrate approaches to the term’s interpretation from different sciences while expanding its scope. With this in mind, we propose the following definition of the term “war narrative”: a special multimodal message about the war created to influence the target audience.We distinguish its three levels: macro-level (message level), meso-level (implementation level), and micro-level (level of the smallest component structures).The proposed definition and conceptual model can serve as a basis for several interdisciplinary studies in the humanities, including linguistics. Future research on the “narrative of war” may focus on further conceptualization and operationalization of the concept at its various levels, typology of war narratives of modern armed conflicts, in particular the Russian-Ukrainian war, and the use of discourse analysis methods, corpus technologies and approaches of pragmatics and cognitive pragmatics to analyze war narratives and their features.

References

1. Баровська А. В. Стратегічні комунікації: досвід НАТО. Стратегічні пріоритети. 2015. № 1. Сc. 147–152.
2. Доктрина «зі стратегічних комунікацій»: Військова керівна публікація військовим організаційним структурам з порядку реалізації стратегічних комунікацій у Збройних Силах України / УПРАВЛІННЯ СТРАТЕ- ГІЧНИХ КОМУНІКАЦІЙ АПАРАТУ ГОЛОВНОКОМАНДУ- ВАЧА ЗБРОЙНИХ СИЛ УКРАЇНИ.-К.: [б.в.], 2020. 36 с. Retrieved 06. 01. 2025 URL: http://elibrary.collegesnau.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Доктрина-зі-стратегічних-комунікацій.pdf#page=8.07
3. Дубов Д. В. Стратегічні комунікації: проблеми концептуалізації та практичної реалізації. Стратегічні пріоритети. серія: політика. 2016. № 4. Сc. 9–23.
5. Barthes R., Duisit L. An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New literary history. 1975. Vol. 6, no. 2. Pp. 237-272. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/468419
6. Bruner J. S. Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press, 1986. 215 p. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019
7. Crystal D. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. 6th ed. Oxford : Blackwell, 2008. 529 p.
8. De Graaf B., Dimitriu G., Ringsmose J. (Eds.). Strategic narratives, public opinion and war: Winning domestic support for the Afghan War. London: Routledge, 2015. 380 p.
9. Dimitriu G., de Graaf B. Fighting the war at home: strategic narratives, elite responsiveness, and the Dutch mission in Afghanistan, 2006-2010. Foreign policy analysis. 2016. Pp. 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12070
10. Freedman L. The transformation of strategic affairs. Routledge, 2006. 144 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820001
11. Genette G. Narrative discourse: an essay in method. Cornell University Press, 1980. 288 p.
12. Defining strategic communication / K. Hallahan et al. International journal of strategic communication. 2007. Vol. 1, no. 1. Pp. 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244
13. Iegorova A. V. From the dawn of narrative studies to the ’narrative turn’. Lviv philological journal. 2021. No. 10. Pp. 37–43. https://doi.org/10.32447/2663-340x-2021-10.6
14. Kvernbekk T., Bøe-Hansen O. How to win wars: the role of the war narrative. Narration as argument. Argumentation Library. Cham, 2017. Pp. 215–234. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_12
15. Labov, W. Oral narratives of personal experience. Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences. 2010. Pp. 546–548.
16. Lyotard J. F. The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 1984. 110 p.
17. Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. Forging the world: Strategic narratives and international relations. Royal Holloway. 2012. 16 p. Retrieved January 10, 2025, from https://pureadmin.qub.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/147369822/Forging_the_World_Working_Paper_2012_Final.pdf
18. NATO. Allied Joint Doctrine for Strategic Communications (AJP-10) (Edition A, Version 1, UK Change 1). 2023. Retrieved January 6, 2025, URL: https://www.gov.uk/ government/publications/allied-joint-doctrine-for-strategic-communications-ajp-10
19. Ornatowski C. M. Rhetoric goes to war: the evolution of the United States of America's narrative of the "War On Terror". African Yearbook of Rhetoric. 2012. Vol. 3, № 3. Pp. 65–74.
20. Sarah R. The narrative turn: interdisciplinary methods and perspectives. Student anthropologist. 2013. Vol. 3, no. 3. Pp. 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.sda2.20130303.0005
Published
2025-06-30
Pages
9-15