INTERPLAY OF VERBAL AND TYPOGRAPHIC MODES IN THE FICTIONAL TEXT. A MULTIMODAL APPROACH
Abstract
Since typography as one of the semiotic resources is a potentially meaningful aspect of written language, the resume can be stated in the observation that typography is a semiotic resource within the multimodal paradigm that offers a framework for analyzing how the typographical effects add to the meaning potential in the fictional text. This paper highlights the interplay of verbal and typographic semiotic modes in Robert Nye’s The Late Mr. Shakespeare
from a multimodal perspective. The typographic semiotic mode of meaning-making is considered to be a component of multimodal literary narrative. I have attempted to integrate typography with already existing methods of analyzing a literary text and to apply the semiotic principles to typography in the narrative which is its visual emphasis. The analysis of typographic meaning-making of the narrative is based on semiotic principles of index, iconicity and discursive import. The notion of salience is used to foreground the prominent parts of the multimodal text (words, phrases or paragraphs) accompanied by different typefaces to make language visible. The distinctive typographical features such as weight, expansion and curvature based on the semiotic principle of visual connotation got a special prominence to multimodal analysis in The Late Mr. Shakespeare. There is admittedly a need to further analyze graphic novels as multisemiotic texts to properly situate and understand such aspects as layout, typography and illustrations in a multimodal perspective.
References
2. Бехта І.А., Карп М.А. Мультимодальні засоби когезії та когерентності у сучасних літературних казках: теоретико-методологічна інтерпретація. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Сер. Філологія. 2014. № 13. С. 87–90.
3. Воробьëва О.П. Словесная голография в пейзажном дискурсе Вирджинии Вулф: модусы, фракталы, фузии. Когниция, Коммуникация, Дискурс. 2010. № 1. С. 47–74.
4. Baldry A., Thibault P. J. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. London: Equinox. 2006. 270 p.
5. Kress G., Van Leeuwen T. Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold, 2001. 142 p.
6. Nørgaard N. Teaching Multimodal Stylistics. Teaching Stylistics. Jeffries L., McIntyre D. (eds.). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 2011. P. 221–238.
7. Nørgaard N. The Semiotics of Typography in Literary Texts. A Multimodal Approach. Orbis Literrarum. 2009. № 64(2). P. 141–160.
8. Nye R. The Late Mr. Shakespeare. New York: Penguin Books. 1998. 399 p.
9. Post J. Typography and Language: A Semiotic Perspective. Semiotics and Visual Communication: Concepts and Practices. Zantides E. (ed.). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2014. P. 126–139.
10. Serafini F., Clausen J. Typography as Semiotic Resource. Journal of Visual Literacy. 2012. № 31(2). P. 1–16.
11. Van Leeuwen T. Towards a Semiotics of Typography. Information Design Journal. 2006. № 14(2). P. 139–155.