COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF THE RECEPTION OF UNNATURAL NARRATIVE IN METAMODERN LITERARY DISCOURSE (BASED ON THE WORKS OF KAZUO ISHIGURO)
Abstract
The article is aimed at revealing and explaining the cognitive mechanisms involved in the interpretation of unnatural narrative elements in contemporary metamodern literary discourse. The focus is placed on the limitations of traditional cognitive models, particularly conceptual metaphor theory and conceptual integration (blending), in explaining the interpretation of complex literary images characterized by multidimensionality, contradiction, and internal tension. An alternative approach is proposed, substantiating the necessity of employing the mechanism of conceptual amalgamation at the initial stage of the reader’s reception of metamodern literary texts through the concept of oscillation. Oscillation is understood as a dynamic movement between different interpretative perspectives, while amalgamation is viewed as cognitive mechanism that ensures the simultaneous coexistence of conflicting meanings within a single cognitive structure. Conceptual oxymoron is seen as a model that captures the tension between incompatible cognitive frames and facilitates the emergence of new meanings. The article develops a multi-level model of reception that includes an initial automatic unconscious stage followed by a stage of conscious interpretation. Particular attention is paid to the interpretative strategies as mechanisms for the naturalization of unnatural reader experience. Based on previous research and the author’s analysis, the following strategies are identified: metaphorical reading, intertextual operations, immersive logic of the fictional world, thematic and archetypal interpretation, frame elaboration, interpretation through narrator’s cognitive bias, phenomenological reading, and anti-naturalization. It is proved that these strategies are not mutually exclusive but may operate simultaneously, forming a complex model for interpreting unnatural elements in literary texts. Unnatural narrative elements are shown to function as cognitive stimuli that activate reader’s interpretative processes and contribute to his/her moral and emotional reflection. Emergent meaning is construed as the result of interaction between the text and the reader within an integrated cognitive system.
References
2. Бєлєхова Л.І. Архетип, архетипний смисл, архетипний образ у лінгвокогнітивному висвітленні (на матеріалі віршованих текстів американської поезії). Науковий вісник Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка. Серія: Філологічні науки (мовознавство). 2015. № 3. С. 6–16.
3. Бєлєхова Л.І. Образний простір американської поезії: лінгвокогнітивний аспект : дис. … д-ра філол. наук : 10.02.04. Київ, 2002. 516 с.
4. Ігнатьєв В.С. Амальгама. Велика українська енциклопедія. 2021. URL: https://vue.gov.ua/Амальгама (дата звернення: 20.04.2026).
5. Колесова А. О. Художній образ Коханої / Коханого в англомовних поетичних текстах ХІХ–ХХ століття: лінгвокогнітивний та гендерний аспекти : дис. … канд. філол. наук : 10.02.04. Херсон, 2012. 210 с.
6. Маріна, О.С. Мобільність парадоксальних поетичних образів (на матеріалі сучасного англомовного поетичного дискурсу). Нова філологія. 2013. № 57. С. 49–53.
7. Цапів А.О. Поетика наративу англійськомовних художніх текстів для дітей : дис. ... д-ра філол. наук : 10.02.04. Харків, 2020. 419 с.
8. Alber J. Unnatural Narrative: Impossible Worlds in Fiction and Drama. Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press, 2016. 320 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1d4v147
9. Alber J., Iversen S., Nielsen H.S., Richardson B. Unnatural narratives, unnatural narratology: Beyond mimetic models. Narrative. 2010. Vol. 18. №. 2. P. 113–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.0.0042
10. Bieliekhova L. Conceptual oxymoron: cognitive mechanism of novel verbal poetic images formation. In Search of (Non) Sense: Literary Semantics and the Related Fields and Disciplines : Fourth International Conference of IALS, 12–14 October 2006. Krakow : Institute of English Philology, the Jagiellonian University, 2006. P. 14–18.
11. Bieliekhova L. Integrated model of poetic text interpretation. Text-Image-Music: Crossing the borders. Intermedial conversations on the poetics of verbal, visual and musical texts / eds. A. Pawelec, A. Shaw, G. Szpila. Berlin : Peter Lang, 2021. P. 199–210. DOI: https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631846698/html/ch22.xhtml
12. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York : Basic Books, 2002. 445 p.
13. Gibbs R.W., Kearney L.R. When parting is such sweet sorrow: The comprehension and appreciation of oxymora. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1994. Vol. 23. P. 75–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143177
14. Ishiguro K. Klara and the Sun. New York : Alfred A. Knopf, 2021. 271 p.
15. Ishiguro K. Never Let Me Go. London : Faber & Faber, 2005. 304 p.
16. Ishiguro K. The Buried Giant. London : Faber & Faber, 2015. 384 p.
17. Ishiguro K. The Remains of the Day. London : Faber & Faber, 1989. 272 p.
18. Lakoff G. Syntactic amalgams. Chicago Linguistic Society. 1974. Vol. 10. P. 321–344.
19. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought.New York : Basic Books, 1999. 624 p.
20. Lakoff G., Turner M. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1989. 237 p.
21. Vermeulen T., van den Akker R. Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture. 2010. Vol. 2. №. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677
22. Vorobyova O.P. Linguistic signals of addressee-orientation in the source and target literary text: A comparative study. CLS 32 : Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in Linguistics, University of Chicago, 11–13 April 1996. Chicago : Chicago Linguistic Society, 1996. P. 165–175.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.