SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN THE SCIENTIFIC ENVIRONMENT
Keywords:
cross-cultural communication, science communication, scientific environment, cross-disciplinary communication, cross-disciplinary audience
Abstract
The problems of cross-cultural communication in the scientific environment have been analysed. Three types of science communication depending on the type of audience have been specified, their peculiar features have been determined and the ways of improving their effectiveness have been suggested.
References
1. Яхонтова Т. Жанри первинної наукової комунікації: сучасні тенденції розвитку. Науковий вісник Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка. Сер.: Філологічні науки (мовознавство). 2014. № 2. С. 135–140.
2. Яхонтова Т. Сучасна наукова комунікація: жанрові інновації. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія: Філологія. 2015. Вип. 14. С. 232–234.
3. Bracken (née Bull) L., Oughton E. “What do you mean?” The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00218.x.
4. Brownell S., Price J., Steinman L. Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2013 Fall; 12(1): E6–E10. Published online 2013 Oct 15. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852879/.
5. Carrada G. Communicating Science “A Scientist’s Survival Kit”. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006. URL:
http://www.livingknowledge.org/fileadmin/DateienLiving-Knowledge/Dokumente_Dateien/Toolbox/LK_C_Communicating_Science_Kit.pdf.
6. Chappell Ch. R.; Hartz J. The challenge of communicating science to the public. Chronicle of Higher Education. 1998. V. 44. Р. 28; Research Library Core, Section: Opinion Page: pg. B7. URL: https://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~wilkins/writing/Resources/essays/sci_comm.html.
7. Hunter Ph. The communications gap between scientists and public. Published online 07.10.2016. EMBO reports (2016) 17, Pp.1513–1515. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.15252/embr.201643379.
8. Leshner A. Public Engagement with Science. Science. 14 Feb 2003. Vol. 299, Issue 5609. P. 977. URL: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/299/5609/977.
9. Jucan M., Jucan C. The Power of Science Communication. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. V. 149. Pp. 461–466. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.288.
10. Torres H., David & E. Pruim. Scientific storytelling: A narrative strategy for scientific communicators. Communication Teacher. 1–5. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17404622.2017.1400679?journalCode=rcmt20.
2. Яхонтова Т. Сучасна наукова комунікація: жанрові інновації. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія: Філологія. 2015. Вип. 14. С. 232–234.
3. Bracken (née Bull) L., Oughton E. “What do you mean?” The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00218.x.
4. Brownell S., Price J., Steinman L. Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2013 Fall; 12(1): E6–E10. Published online 2013 Oct 15. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852879/.
5. Carrada G. Communicating Science “A Scientist’s Survival Kit”. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006. URL:
http://www.livingknowledge.org/fileadmin/DateienLiving-Knowledge/Dokumente_Dateien/Toolbox/LK_C_Communicating_Science_Kit.pdf.
6. Chappell Ch. R.; Hartz J. The challenge of communicating science to the public. Chronicle of Higher Education. 1998. V. 44. Р. 28; Research Library Core, Section: Opinion Page: pg. B7. URL: https://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~wilkins/writing/Resources/essays/sci_comm.html.
7. Hunter Ph. The communications gap between scientists and public. Published online 07.10.2016. EMBO reports (2016) 17, Pp.1513–1515. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.15252/embr.201643379.
8. Leshner A. Public Engagement with Science. Science. 14 Feb 2003. Vol. 299, Issue 5609. P. 977. URL: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/299/5609/977.
9. Jucan M., Jucan C. The Power of Science Communication. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. V. 149. Pp. 461–466. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.288.
10. Torres H., David & E. Pruim. Scientific storytelling: A narrative strategy for scientific communicators. Communication Teacher. 1–5. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17404622.2017.1400679?journalCode=rcmt20.
Published
2018-03-27
Pages
174-177
Issue
Section
СЕКЦІЯ 3. МІЖКУЛЬТУРНА КОМУНІКАЦІЯ
